Skip to main navigation Skip to main content Skip to page footer

How do I plan a scale-up from pilot plant to production for spice blends so that mixing times and quality are maintained?

The aim of a scale-up of spice mixtures is to ensure that the homogeneity achieved in the laboratory or pilot plant, the mixing times and the gentle treatment of the ingredients are also maintained with considerably larger quantities of bulk material, larger plants and different process environments.

Spice mixtures are particularly demanding here, because they contain components with widely differing particle sizes and bulk densities. Examples are coarse pepper and fine paprika powder, heavy salt and light herbs. Added to this are differing flow properties and cohesion, micro-components used in very small quantities such as flavourings or vitamins, and constituents sensitive to moisture and fat such as aromatic and essential oils. A purely volumetric 1:1 scale-up here frequently leads to deviating sensory properties and must be replaced by systematic scale-up planning.

Before every scale-up, the bulk material properties of the individual components and of the final mixture are characterised. This includes, for example, the particle size distribution, bulk and tapped density, angle of repose and wall friction, residual moisture and water activity, fat or oil content and the tendency to form deposits. In parallel, the established mixing process is documented in the pilot plant, since it forms the reference for the production scale. Mixer type, fill level, speed, mixing time, energy input and order of addition are documented, among other things.

Three similarity criteria are decisive for transferable mixing behaviour:

  • geometric similarity (the same design principle, comparable length-to-diameter ratios, similar tool geometry)
  • kinematic similarity (retention of the movement characteristics of the mixing bed, for example via a constant Froude number describing the ratio of centrifugal to gravitational forces)
  • dynamic similarity (comparable loading and energy input per particle, in order to avoid breakage, attrition and loss of aroma)

The speed in the production mixer must be adapted to the larger radius, so that the mixing regime is maintained and the specific energy input lies within the same range. The Froude number plays a role here only for mixing systems with a horizontally mounted mixing tool.

In the scale-up, the production mixer should be as geometrically similar as possible to the pilot plant unit, ideally with the same mixing principle in a larger size. The following proven mixer types have become established for spice mixtures:

  • vertical helical mixers for three-dimensional mixing at a low circumferential speed,
  • conical mixers with a central mixing shaft for a wide fill-level range,
  • ploughshare or paddle mixers for high mixing quality with large differences in density,
  • conical screw mixers with a planetary orbiting screw for particularly gentle treatment of sensitive herb leaves,
  • ribbon blenders for large batches with longer mixing times, and
  • twin-shaft mixers for short mixing times at high batch sizes.

Overfilled mixers create dead zones and lengthen the mixing time, while fill levels that are too low reduce the effectiveness of the cutting rotor, which can have a negative effect on homogeneity. At the same time, the dynamic pressure and the surface-to-volume ratio change at large scale, which influences the friction conditions and the formation of deposits, particularly with oil-containing mixtures.

Sensitive components such as herb leaves or freeze-dried pieces of vegetable and fruit react sensitively to high mechanical loading. If the circumferential speed increases too sharply during scale-up, attrition and breakage increase.

Mixing quality should be recorded quantitatively, typically via the coefficient of variation of a lead or tracer component. In the pilot plant, samples are taken at defined points in time in order to obtain a mixing time versus mixing quality curve and to determine the optimum mixing point. At production scale, multi-point sampling from different zones of the mixer is additionally carried out in order to obtain representative data on homogeneity and to avoid overmixing. Mixing times that are too long can in turn favour segregation through demixing or centrifugal forces.

Recipe management, the order of addition and the dosing strategy are equally important. Micro-components are frequently prediluted in premixes with part of a main component, in order to avoid dosing errors and local over-concentrations. The order of addition is optimised so that very heavy or very fine components do not separate at an early stage. Oil and flavouring components are preferably dosed via spray or injection systems, so that droplet size, wetting and lump formation can be controlled. At the same time the shear input is managed deliberately, in order to achieve good distribution while preserving the structure.

Many quality deviations arise only in the downstream process steps. Drop heights should therefore be minimised and conveying paths kept as short as possible. Conveying principles should also be chosen that do not favour segregation. Silo and hopper discharge should ideally be designed for mass flow, since air streams can transport fine particles selectively and thus disturb homogeneity.

At production scale, the specific energy input must also be monitored. An increased energy input leads to warming and can impair aromatic oils and volatile components. Condensation can occur in the packaged final product.

The core principles can be summarised as follows:

  • choose a geometrically similar mixer type from pilot plant to production,
  • maintain the mixing regime as far as possible via suitable characteristic numbers,
  • keep the fill level constant,
  • demonstrate the mixing quality quantitatively,
  • ensure product protection through a limited circumferential speed and controlled energy input,
  • introduce micro-components and liquid additives reliably,
  • examine downstream processes for segregation risks,
  • secure the scale-up through several validation stages.

How amixon® plans a trial and scale-up programme in the pilot plant

The operator's objectives are defined precisely at the outset. These include the required mixing quality, for example a target RSD, the discharge rate, requirements for product protection such as particle integrity and limited heat input, as well as the planned batch size range and cycle time. amixon® specialists translate these criteria into a structured trial programme on a suitable test unit. The size is chosen so that it matches the quantity of product available.

The trials follow a systematic variation of parameters. The scale-up-relevant variables are varied: mixing time, circumferential speed of the mixing tools in the range of approximately 0.8 to 3.5 m/s, fill level and – where relevant – dosing rate and the manner of liquid addition. Liquids can be introduced via lances or two-fluid nozzles, with or without a cutting rotor. Samples are taken for each trial point and the mixing quality is determined. The discharge rates are verified gravimetrically. The basis is the congruence of the amixon® mixing systems and their restratification frequency.

The conveying volume I_V is described via geometry and operating data. It follows from I_V = (π/4) · (D² − d²) · Φ · S · n · ζ.

D and d denote the outer and inner diameter of the helix, Φ the fill level relative to the usable volume, S the pitch of the helix, n the rotational frequency in revolutions per second and ζ the tool- and product-specific velocity coefficient. From this it becomes clear that the entire mixing chamber volume is completely traversed and restratified after only a few revolutions.

The parameters determined are transferred to the production scale. Pilot plant and production mixers work on the same mixing principle of SinConvex® total flow. Scaling takes place via the restratification formula, that is via the conveying volume flow of the helical mixing tool and the restratification frequency derived from it – not via the rotational speed alone. The size grid in 100-litre increments up to 50,000 litres – and in 1 m³ increments up to about 100 m³ for the Gyraton® mixing silo – permits precise design for the desired target batch size without a break in similarity. Available for selection are vertical single-shaft mixers (type VM), vertical twin-shaft mixers (type HM), conical mixers (type AM), KoneSlid® mixers (type KS), SpherHelics® hollow-sphere mixers (type SH), the Gyraton® mixing silo (type GM) and the conical continuous mixer (type AMK). amixon® thus advises the customer openly, honestly and with the application in mind.

The documentation of the trials serves as a sound basis for investment. The tests are carried out, evaluated and fully documented jointly. A trial report confirms the process parameters under real conditions and names the optimal apparatus. These results feed directly into the plant specification (URS). Target RSD, discharge rates and cycle times are defined in a contractually sound manner. Technical and economic risks are thus clarified before the investment rather than during ongoing operation.

For tea, herbs and spices, amixon® mixes particularly gently. The low-speed mode of operation preserves fragile leaves and sensitive particles. The mixing chamber can be discharged almost completely and cleaning is quick. Frequent changes of formulation are therefore possible with process reliability. The Gyraton® GM homogenises spices, tea and coffee in large batches of up to 100 m³.

Manufacture in Paderborn is the foundation of amixon® quality. Development and production take place exclusively at the Paderborn works with a high degree of in-house manufacture. All components come from qualified sources in Germany. As a certified welding specialist with European, Japanese, Korean and American qualifications, amixon® designs every apparatus as a one-off on the basis of the operator's URS. Quality control remains entirely in-house without gaps, and every specification is demonstrable down to component level. This manufacturing autonomy also secures long-term supply. Every component can still be reproduced decades later.